Coach on Trial
Every fourth down against our expected-points model: go, punt or kick. The Chicken Index, the points left on the table, the calls that were right.
The Chicken Index
Share of go calls the coach kicked away↳Bottom lineLeague-wide, coaches went for it on 162 of 333 go calls (49%).
?How to read this chart
- Go calls:
- fourth downs where the model said going for it beat kicking (clearly or slightly). Went: how many the coach actually went for.
- Chicken:
- the share of those go calls the coach answered with a punt or a field goal. Higher = more timid.
- EP lost:
- expected points given up on all graded calls against the model's best choice; Per game divides it by games played.
| Coach | Graded | Go calls | Went | Chicken | EP lost | Per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 5.2 | 0.65 | |
| 47 | 11 | 1 | 91% | 6.7 | 0.74 | |
| 42 | 8 | 1 | 88% | 5.8 | 0.72 | |
| 46 | 14 | 3 | 79% | 9.5 | 1.06 | |
| 25 | 8 | 2 | 75% | 4.8 | 0.60 | |
| 50 | 10 | 3 | 70% | 4.3 | 0.48 | |
| 47 | 12 | 4 | 67% | 6.9 | 0.86 | |
| 42 | 14 | 5 | 64% | 9.1 | 1.14 | |
| 50 | 8 | 3 | 63% | 4.2 | 0.47 | |
| 54 | 13 | 5 | 62% | 5.6 | 0.70 | |
| 34 | 10 | 4 | 60% | 5.5 | 0.69 | |
| 47 | 14 | 6 | 57% | 7.9 | 0.88 | |
| 37 | 7 | 3 | 57% | 6.2 | 0.69 | |
| 38 | 9 | 4 | 56% | 4.0 | 0.50 | |
| 48 | 11 | 5 | 55% | 5.5 | 0.61 | |
| 44 | 13 | 6 | 54% | 8.3 | 0.92 | |
| 46 | 17 | 9 | 47% | 6.5 | 0.72 | |
| 23 | 11 | 6 | 46% | 4.2 | 0.53 | |
| 40 | 9 | 5 | 44% | 2.8 | 0.35 | |
| 43 | 9 | 5 | 44% | 5.9 | 0.74 | |
| 53 | 12 | 7 | 42% | 3.1 | 0.34 | |
| 35 | 10 | 6 | 40% | 3.6 | 0.40 | |
| 37 | 11 | 7 | 36% | 3.9 | 0.43 | |
| 41 | 14 | 9 | 36% | 3.2 | 0.36 | |
| 42 | 15 | 10 | 33% | 4.6 | 0.51 | |
| 32 | 12 | 8 | 33% | 4.4 | 0.55 | |
| 41 | 9 | 6 | 33% | 3.0 | 0.33 | |
| 35 | 7 | 5 | 29% | 3.3 | 0.37 | |
| 37 | 8 | 6 | 25% | 1.7 | 0.21 | |
| 38 | 9 | 7 | 22% | 1.4 | 0.17 | |
| 38 | 9 | 7 | 22% | 2.8 | 0.35 | |
| 38 | 5 | 4 | 20% | 2.3 | 0.29 |
The decision chart
What our model says, early in a close game↳Bottom lineOn 4th and 1 the model says go from as far back as their own 5; on 4th and 4, from their own 30 onward.
?How to read this chart
- Rows = where the ball is,
- from your own half at the top to the opponent's goal line at the bottom. Columns = yards to go for a first down, 1 to 10+.
- The color is the best call
- by expected points (what a possession is worth on average from that spot): green go for it, blue punt, gold field goal. Darker = the best call wins by more, so it is clearer.
- The number in each cell
- is the chance to convert, in percent.
- It shows a normal moment,
- early in a close game. Late in games the clock and the score change the math, and those calls are not graded.
The costliest calls
Season · expected points thrown away↳Bottom lineThe calls against the model in this list cost 21.5 expected points in total.
?How to read this chart
- Each row is one fourth down:
- distance, spot, score, what the coach chose and what our model would have done (a clear call, a lean or a toss-up).
- The number on the right
- is what the choice cost in expected points (EP, what a possession is worth on average from that spot): −1.00 means about a point thrown away. ✓ = the coach made the model's call.
- The result
- is what happened next; the grade judges the decision, not the outcome.
- 1HOU · 4th & 1DeMeco Ryans chose Field goal at opp 7, Wk 6 Q2 4:18, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: good.−2.03 EP
- 2LA · 4th & 1Sean McVay chose Punt at own 44, Wk 6 Q1 13:44, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.52 EP
- 3TEN · 4th & 1Robert Saleh chose Punt at own 43, Wk 6 Q2 8:49, down 7. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.49 EP
- 4CAR · 4th & 1Dave Canales chose Punt at own 42, Wk 6 Q1 1:48, up 3. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.46 EP
- 5ARI · 4th & 1Mike LaFleur chose Punt at own 40, Wk 1 Q4 14:04, up 2. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.41 EP
- 6NYJ · 4th & 1Aaron Glenn chose Punt at own 40, Wk 3 Q1 12:54, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.41 EP
- 7NYJ · 4th & 1Aaron Glenn chose Punt at own 40, Wk 5 Q4 10:45, up 4. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.41 EP
- 8GB · 4th & 2Matt LaFleur chose Punt at opp 44, Wk 4 Q1 10:27, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.40 EP
- 9DAL · 4th & 1Brian Schottenheimer chose Punt at own 39, Wk 9 Q4 7:50, up 3. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.38 EP
- 10SF · 4th & 1Kyle Shanahan chose Punt at own 38, Wk 5 Q1 14:04, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.36 EP
- 11BAL · 4th & 1Jesse Minter chose Punt at own 37, Wk 2 Q4 8:14, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.34 EP
- 12IND · 4th & 1Shane Steichen chose Punt at own 37, Wk 4 Q1 0:27, down 6. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: punted.−1.34 EP
- 13HOU · 4th & 1DeMeco Ryans chose Field goal at opp 40, Wk 2 Q3 7:33, down 7. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: missed.−1.31 EP
- 14IND · 4th & 2Shane Steichen chose Field goal at opp 5, Wk 6 Q2 2:09, up 7. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: good.−1.31 EP
- 15NYG · 4th & 13John Harbaugh chose Punt at opp 37, Wk 7 Q3 10:13, tied. Model: Field goal (clear call). Result: punted.−1.30 EP
Brave and right
Went for it when the numbers said so, clearest first- 1MIA · 4th & 1Jeff Hafley chose Go for it at opp 2, Wk 7 Q1 1:46, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: converted.✓ EP
- 2BAL · 4th & 1Jesse Minter chose Go for it at opp 5, Wk 4 Q1 12:13, tied. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: touchdown.✓ EP
- 3GB · 4th & 1Matt LaFleur chose Go for it at opp 7, Wk 3 Q3 10:02, down 10. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: stopped.✓ EP
- 4LV · 4th & 1Klint Kubiak chose Go for it at opp 46, Wk 8 Q2 3:58, down 6. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: stopped.✓ EP
- 5SEA · 4th & 1Mike Macdonald chose Go for it at opp 45, Wk 1 Q4 11:38, down 7. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: touchdown.✓ EP
- 6IND · 4th & 1Shane Steichen chose Go for it at opp 45, Wk 7 Q2 4:46, up 1. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: converted.✓ EP
- 7KC · 4th & 1Andy Reid chose Go for it at opp 48, Wk 2 Q3 12:01, down 3. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: converted.✓ EP
- 8IND · 4th & 1Shane Steichen chose Go for it at opp 48, Wk 3 Q3 3:24, up 6. Model: Go for it (clear call). Result: converted.✓ EP
How it works
The model. Built only from this season's play-by-play. Conversion chance comes from a logistic fit on every third and fourth down pass or run by yards to go (goal-to-go lowers it). Success is valued at the expected points of a first down 6.3 yards past the marker (the average overshoot), or a touchdown; failure hands the opponent the ball at the spot. A punt is valued at where opponents really start after punts from that spot; a field goal at its make probability by distance times 3, with a miss giving the ball back at the spot of the kick. Expected points of a first down come from nflverse's EP model, smoothed by field position.
Grading. Only decisions with the game in doubt are graded: offense win probability between 10% and 90%, outside the last five minutes of the fourth quarter, the last two minutes of the first half and overtime, where the clock and the score change the math. A call is clear when the best option beats the next one by 0.75 expected points or more, a lean from 0.25, otherwise a toss-up. The Chicken Index is the share of clear or leaning go calls the coach answered with a punt or a kick. The model knows nothing about injuries, weather or the specific offense, so read single calls with that in mind; over a season the pattern is the story.
Pigskin Nightly, "Coach on Trial, 2026", https://pigskinnightly.com/verdict/fourth-down (2026)CC BY 4.0Data licenseCSVJSONEmbedHow it works