Week 1 · 2026Packers 22 · 39 Vikings
149 plays, one strand. Vikings won after 1 lead change; Packers peaked at 91% to win, Vikings at 100%. The white spine is the win probability, every rung a snap: up for MIN, down for GB, as long as the yards it gained.
↳Bottom line1 lead change; Packers peaked at 91% to win, Vikings at 100%.
?How to read this chart
- Read it left to right:
- kickoff on the left, final whistle on the right.
- The white line
- is the chance that Vikings win, play by play. High = MIN in control, low = GB in control, the middle is a coin flip. Each crossing of the middle is a change in who was more likely to win.
- Each little bar is one play:
- up for MIN on offense, down for GB; the longer the bar, the more yards. The key under the picture explains the marks (touchdown, turnover, field goal, punt).
The strands compared
?How to read this chart
- Each row compares the two teams
- on one stat: GB on the left, MIN on the right. The longer bar is the bigger number.
- Explosive plays
- are long gains (big runs and passes). Peak win prob. is the highest chance to win each team reached at any moment.
Every possession
?How to read this chart
- Each tile is one possession,
- in game order, colored by the team that had the ball.
- Inside:
- the team, how it ended (TD = touchdown, FG = field goal, INT = interception, FUM = fumble, otherwise punt or downs) and the yards gained. Brighter tiles are drives that scored.
The plays that moved it most
↳Bottom lineThe biggest swing: play 1, 4.1 expected points against Vikings.
?How to read this chart
- The strip is the game clock;
- each numbered dot is one of the plays below, placed when it happened and colored by the team on offense.
- EP (expected points)
- is how many points the play added to (+) or took away from (−) the offense's expected score. +3.5 EP is worth more than a field goal; big minus numbers are usually turnovers.
- 1Q1 14:23 · MIN · Interception−4.1 EP
1-K.Murray pass deep right intended for 14-J.Jennings INTERCEPTED by 25-K.Nixon [44-Z.Franklin] at GB 36. 25-K.Nixon to GB 47 for 11 yards (
- 2Q1 7:54 · GB · Touchdown+7.0 EP
10-J.Love pass deep middle to 9-C.Watson for 81 yards, TOUCHDOWN. MIN-2-I.Rodgers was injured during the play.
- 3Q2 2:02 · MIN · Touchdown+3.8 EP
11-C.Wentz pass deep left to 18-J.Jefferson for 39 yards, TOUCHDOWN. Penalty on GB-90-L.Van Ness, Defensive Offside, declined.
- 4Q4 15:00 · GB · Completion+3.5 EP
10-J.Love pass deep middle to 0-M.Golden to MIN 26 for 42 yards (44-J.Metellus).
- 5Q4 13:17 · GB · Run−4.3 EP
10-J.Love right guard to MIN 17 for no gain (97-D.Orange). (Virtual Measurement).
- 6Q4 5:01 · GB · Fumble lost−5.8 EP
10-J.Love sacked at GB 11 for -12 yards (sack split by 43-A.Van Ginkel and 51-B.Cashman). FUMBLES (43-A.Van Ginkel) [51-B.Cashman], RECOVERE
- 7Q4 4:21 · GB · Interception−6.6 EP
10-J.Love pass short middle intended for 9-C.Watson INTERCEPTED by 23-J.Pierre (22-H.Smith) at GB 42. 23-J.Pierre pushed ob at GB 14 for 28
- 8Q4 1:31 · GB · Incomplete−3.7 EP
10-J.Love pass incomplete short middle to 23-S.Moore.
The one play that could have changed it
?How to read this chart
- The line is win probability
- over the game (top = home team ahead). The dot marks the one play that could have gone either way; the big % is the losing team's chance right after it.
- Press Flip it
- to see where that chance would have gone if the play had gone the other way. Only that instant is priced: the rest of the game never happened.
If the Packers had converted that fourth-and-1
Q4 13:17 10-J.Love right guard to MIN 17 for no gain (97-D.Orange). (Virtual Measurement).