Week 1 · 202649ers 27 · 7 Rams
134 plays, one strand. 49ers won after 2 lead changes; 49ers peaked at 100% to win, Rams at 74%. The white spine is the win probability, every rung a snap: up for LAR, down for SF, as long as the yards it gained.
↳Bottom line2 lead changes; 49ers peaked at 100% to win, Rams at 74%.
?How to read this chart
- Read it left to right:
- kickoff on the left, final whistle on the right.
- The white line
- is the chance that Rams win, play by play. High = LAR in control, low = SF in control, the middle is a coin flip. Each crossing of the middle is a change in who was more likely to win.
- Each little bar is one play:
- up for LAR on offense, down for SF; the longer the bar, the more yards. The key under the picture explains the marks (touchdown, turnover, field goal, punt).
The strands compared
?How to read this chart
- Each row compares the two teams
- on one stat: SF on the left, LAR on the right. The longer bar is the bigger number.
- Explosive plays
- are long gains (big runs and passes). Peak win prob. is the highest chance to win each team reached at any moment.
Every possession
?How to read this chart
- Each tile is one possession,
- in game order, colored by the team that had the ball.
- Inside:
- the team, how it ended (TD = touchdown, FG = field goal, INT = interception, FUM = fumble, otherwise punt or downs) and the yards gained. Brighter tiles are drives that scored.
The plays that moved it most
↳Bottom lineThe biggest swing: play 1, 4.6 expected points against 49ers.
?How to read this chart
- The strip is the game clock;
- each numbered dot is one of the plays below, placed when it happened and colored by the team on offense.
- EP (expected points)
- is how many points the play added to (+) or took away from (−) the offense's expected score. +3.5 EP is worth more than a field goal; big minus numbers are usually turnovers.
- 1Q2 12:09 · SF · Interception−4.6 EP
13-B.Purdy pass short right intended for 85-G.Kittle INTERCEPTED by 37-Q.Lake at LA 31. 37-Q.Lake to LA 31 for no gain (85-G.Kittle).
- 2Q2 8:58 · LAR · Interception−3.0 EP
9-M.Stafford pass deep right intended for 12-P.Nacua INTERCEPTED by 0-R.Green at SF 14. 0-R.Green to SF 14 for no gain (12-P.Nacua).
- 3Q2 4:35 · SF · Touchdown+4.1 EP
13-B.Purdy pass deep middle to 11-D.Robinson for 39 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
- 4Q3 3:46 · LAR · Run−3.8 EP
9-M.Stafford right guard to SF 1 for no gain (92-O.Odighizuwa). The Replay Official reviewed the short of the goal line ruling, and the play
- 5Q4 11:19 · LAR · Fumble lost−5.3 EP
9-M.Stafford pass short middle to 89-T.Higbee to LA 44 for 5 yards (54-F.Warner; 57-D.Greenlaw). FUMBLES (54-F.Warner), RECOVERED by SF-56-K
- 6Q4 7:58 · LAR · Incomplete−2.8 EP
9-M.Stafford pass incomplete deep right to 18-T.Ferguson [92-O.Odighizuwa].
- 7Q4 3:34 · SF · Missed field goal−3.5 EP
18-E.Pineiro 52 yard field goal is No Good, Hit Right Upright, Center-46-J.Weeks, Holder-15-C.Waitman.
- 8Q4 0:14 · LAR · Run−3.5 EP
20-R.Rivers left end to SF 13 for 2 yards (0-R.Green).
The one play that could have changed it
?How to read this chart
- The line is win probability
- over the game (top = home team ahead). The dot marks the one play that could have gone either way; the big % is the losing team's chance right after it.
- Press Flip it
- to see where that chance would have gone if the play had gone the other way. Only that instant is priced: the rest of the game never happened.
If the Rams had converted that fourth-and-1
Q3 3:46 9-M.Stafford right guard to SF 1 for no gain (92-O.Odighizuwa). The Replay Official reviewed the short of the goal line ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands.